Relevant research

Ideas that help us see the work differently.

A curated selection of research that challenges familiar assumptions and opens new questions about human contribution, AI and organizational value.

Organizational transformation · Peer-reviewed article

Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance

Erik Brynjolfsson and Lorin M. Hitt Journal of Economic Perspectives · Fall 2000

Why it matters

Technology creates value through complementary changes in processes, structures and ways of working, not through technical capability alone.

Question it opens

What complementary changes in roles, decisions and organizational structures are required for AI investment to create value?

Read the source

Human expertise · Working paper

Applying AI to Rebuild Middle Class Jobs

David Autor NBER Working Paper · February 2024

Why it matters

AI could extend the reach and value of human expertise, but only if organizations choose to use it to widen access to consequential work rather than simply remove labour.

Question it opens

Will organizations use AI to extend human expertise and agency, or primarily to remove labour?

Read the source

Systems thinking · Open-access scholarly book

Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety

Nancy G. Leveson MIT Press · 2012

Why it matters

Safety is not simply a property of reliable components. It emerges from the controls, feedback, decisions and interactions across the whole system.

Question it opens

What controls and feedback are needed when risk emerges from interactions across the wider organizational system?

Read the source

Machine intelligence · Peer-reviewed article

Building Machines That Learn and Think Like People

Brenden M. Lake, Tomer D. Ullman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum and Samuel J. Gershman Behavioral and Brain Sciences · 2017

Why it matters

High performance does not mean that machines learn, reason or understand as people do. That distinction matters when deciding what AI should be trusted to contribute.

Question it opens

Where might fluent performance be mistaken for understanding, judgment or human-like learning?

Read the source